Actually I’ve nothing against heroes. I’m happy to read
fantasy books with a cool heroes putting down the smack on the bad guys. I grew
up on that stuff. Obviously I want it well written, with intelligence and
passion, but if it can be boiled down to ‘good guy smacks bad guy’, no problem.
However – let’s be clear about this. Fantasy is defined by
being free and open. It contains elements of the fantastic. The imagination of
both author and reader is unbound. That’s fantasy. There’s nothing on the box
that says ‘hero required’.
I read a lot of non-fantasy books. Actually, that’s a lie – I get very little
time to read these days. In the past I have read a lot of non-fantasy books.
Books that are about people rather than heroes. Books that have protagonists.
The main characters in the catch-all that is ‘literary fiction’ are often just
ordinary people going through the struggle of their lives, and we get caught up
in their stories, hooked by the same fascination that attracts so many people
to soap operas, combined with the beauty of the writing, and the deeper
observations that the author is attempting to make, the deeper truths they try
to approach.
Although fantasy can be as broad as literary fiction, but with the added goodness of being able to step outside any boundary reality imposes... actually it's a much more limited genre in many respects, straitjacketed by expectation.
Reaction to Prince of Thorns, and specifically the
protagonist, Jorg Ancrath, often runs
thusly:
Call this a hero? I can’t get behind a hero who does XXXX or
YYYY. What were you thinking, Lawrence?
Or
This author desperately wants me to like Jorg and approve of
his actions. I however am built of finer stuff and my moral fiber will not
allow me to support such a character.
Some are less reactionary and
simply file Jorg under ‘antihero’.
However, I don’t think Jorg is a
hero, anti-hero, or villain. He is, for want of a better description, a person.
I didn’t set out to make the reader like him and I certainly don’t expect the
reader to approve of his actions. My only goal was that the story about him be
interesting and make the reader care.
Traditional anti-heroes in my experience fall into two
categories. There are the every-man types, ill-suited to the heroic roles
thrust upon them – Frodo would fall into this group. And there are the pragmatic, sly, or cowardly ones, often saved from the reader’s dislike by their charisma and wit,
or by the comedic value of their failures, perhaps we might cite Vance's Cugel the Clever or GRRM's Tyrion here.
Jorg confuses some by straddling the categories. On the one
hand he won’t back down and is fearless and dangerous – traditional hero
characteristics. On the other hand he is sly and charismatic – traditional antihero
characteristics. Add to that the fact that he has no interest in doing good,
and is happy to murder his way toward his self-serving goals – traditional villain
characteristics.
I think Jorg could be described as all of them. What Jorg certainly is not is ordinary. He’s a prodigy,
extremely intelligent and creative, old beyond his years, charming, a very
skilled swordsman. Yes he has failings – anger control issues, a lack of
scruples, a poor singing voice, an inability to compromise, lack of empathy,
but he is in the traditional fantasy vein, someone extraordinary.
In my next book the main protagonist fits the anti-hero
mold more closely, swapping a measure of angst for less conflicted greed, and
replacing skill with bluster. He’s a man out of control of his destiny, whose
goals are small and decadent ones that he tries to snatch at as the world
sweeps him along.
I don’t feel however
that the character is less original. The ability to fit a character into a
broad category doesn’t by necessity rob the reader of any enjoyment. They say
the devil is in the detail. But then again, so is all the good stuff. I’ll do my best to
get that right and hope you enjoy where it takes us!
